Up one level

SDG Target 11.4

SDG Target 11.4

Redoblar los esfuerzos para proteger y salvaguardar el patrimonio cultural y natural del mundo

Indicadores

Correlación con Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

META 3

Conseguir y hacer posible que, para 2030, al menos el 30 por ciento de las zonas terrestres, de aguas continentales y costeras y marinas, especialmente las zonas de particular importancia para la biodiversidad y las funciones y los servicios de los ecosistemas, se conserven y gestionen eficazmente mediante sistemas de áreas protegidas ecológicamente representativos, bien conectados y gobernados de forma equitativa, y otras medidas eficaces de conservación basadas en zonas geográficas específicas, el reconocimiento de los territorios indígenas y tradicionales, cuando proceda, integrados en paisajes terrestres, marinos y oceánicos más amplios, velando al mismo tiempo por que todo uso sostenible, cuando proceda en dichas zonas, sea plenamente coherente con los resultados de la conservación, reconociendo y respetando los derechos de los pueblos indígenas y las comunidades locales.

Correlación con CBD - Aichi Targets

Meta 1

Para 2020, a más tardar, las personas tendrán conciencia del valor de la diversidad biológica y de los pasos que pueden dar para su conservación y utilización sostenible.

Meta 5

Para 2020, se habrá reducido por lo menos a la mitad y, donde resulte factible, se habrá reducido hasta un valor cercano a cero, el ritmo de pérdida de todos los hábitats naturales, incluidos los bosques, y se habrá reducido de manera significativa la degradación y fragmentación.

Meta 10

Para 2015, se habrán reducido al mínimo las múltiples presiones antropógenas sobre los arrecifes de coral y otros ecosistemas vulnerables afectados por el cambio climático o la acidificación de los océanos, a fin de mantener su integridad y funcionamiento.

Meta 11

Para 2020, al menos el 17% de las zonas terrestres y de las aguas interiores y el 10% de las zonas marinas y costeras, especialmente las que revisten particular importancia para la diversidad biológica y los servicios de los ecosistemas, se habrán conservado por medio de sistemas de áreas protegidas administrados de manera eficaz y equitativa, ecológicamente representativos y bien conectados, y de otras medidas de conservación eficaces basadas en áreas, y estas estarán integradas a los paisajes terrestres y marinos más amplios.

Meta 14

Para 2020, se habrán restaurado y salvaguardado los ecosistemas que proporcionan servicios esenciales, incluidos servicios relacionados con el agua, y que contribuyen a la salud, los medios de vida y el bienestar, tomando en cuenta las necesidades de las mujeres, las comunidades indígenas y locales y las personas pobres y vulnerables.

Meta 15

Para 2020, se habrá incrementado la capacidad de recuperación de los ecosistemas y la contribución de la diversidad biológica a las reservas de carbono, mediante la conservación y la restauración, incluida la restauración de por lo menos el 15% de los ecosistemas degradados, contribuyendo así a la mitigación del cambio climático y a la adaptación a este, así como a la lucha contra la desertificación.

Meta 17

Para 2015, cada Parte habrá elaborado, adoptado como un instrumento de política, y comenzado a poner en práctica una estrategia y un plan de acción nacionales en materia de diversidad biológica eficaces, participativos y actualizados.

Meta 20

Para 2020, a más tardar, debería aumentar de manera sustancial, en relación con los niveles actuales, la movilización de recursos financieros para aplicar de manera efectiva el Plan Estratégico para la Diversidad Biológica 2011-2020, provenientes de todas las fuentes y conforme al proceso refundido y convenido en la Estrategia para la movilización de recursos. Esta meta estará sujeta a cambios según las evaluaciones de recursos necesarios que las Partes hayan llevado a cabo y presentado en sus informes.

Correlación con 4th Ramsar Strategic Plan 2016-2024

Ramsar Target 1

Wetland benefits are featured in national/local policy strategies and plans relating to key sectors such as water, energy, mining, agriculture, tourism, urban development, infrastructure, industry, forestry, aquaculture, fisheries at the national and local level.

Baseline
  • 19% of Parties have made assessment of ecosystem services of Ramsar Sites. (National Reports to COP12).
  • 70% of Parties have included wetland issues within national strategies and planning processes such as water resource management and water efficiency plans. (National Reports to COP12).
  • 47% of Contracting Parties have included wetland issues within National Policies or measures on agriculture. (National Reports to COP12).
Indicator
  • % of Parties that have made assessment of ecosystem services of Ramsar Sites. (Data source: National Reports).
  • % of Parties that have included wetland issues within national strategies and planning processes such as water resource management and water efficiency plans. (Data source: National Reports).
  • % of Parties that have included wetland issues within National Policies or measures on agriculture. (Data source: National Reports).
Ramsar Target 3

The public and private sectors have increased their efforts to apply guidelines and good practices for the wise use of water and wetlands.

Baseline
  • 50% of Parties report actions taken to implement incentive measures that encourage the conservation and wise use of wetlands. (National Reports to COP12).
  • 37% of Parties report actions taken to remove perverse incentive measures that discourage conservation and wise use of wetlands. (National Reports to COP12).
  • 60% of Parties report private sector undertaking activities for the conservation, wise use and management of wetlands in general. (National Reports to COP12).
  • % of Parties have national Ramsar Committees that include both governmental and non-governmental representation. (Data source: new question for National Reports).
Indicator
  • % of Parties reporting actions taken to implement incentive measures that encourage the conservation and wise use of wetlands. (Data source: National Reports).
  • % of Parties reporting actions taken to remove perverse incentive measures that discourage conservation and wise use of wetlands. (Data source: National Reports).
  • % of Parties reporting private sector undertaking activities for the conservation, wise use and management of wetlands in general. (Data source: National Reports).
  • % of Parties having national Ramsar Committees that include both governmental and non-governmental representation. (Data source: new question for National Reports).
Ramsar Target 5

The ecological character of Ramsar sites is maintained or restored, through effective planning and integrated management.

Baseline
  • At COP12, 973 Ramsar Sites have implemented management plans. (National Reports to COP12).
  • Number of Ramsar Sites that have effective, implemented management plans. (Data source: new National Report question).
  • 27% of Parties have made assessments of effective management of Ramsar sites. (National Reports to COP12).
  • 43% (950 of Ramsar Sites have updated Ramsar Information Sheets. (Report of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 8.2 COP12 Doc.7).
Indicator
  • Number of Ramsar Sites that have effective, implemented management plans. (Data source: National Report).
  • Number of Ramsar Sites that have effective, implemented management planning. (Data source: new National Report question).
  • % of Parties that have made assessments of effective management of Ramsar Sites. (Data source: National Reports).
  • % of Ramsar Sites that have updated Ramsar Information Sheets. (Data source: Ramsar Sites database).

Possible further indicators that may be developed

  • {Coverage of wetland dependent bird populations by designated Ramsar Sites. Indicator from Resolution IX.1 to be developed}.
  • {Coverage of wetland dependent non-avian populations by designated Ramsar Sites. Indicator from Resolution IX.1 to be developed}.
  • {% loss of IUCN Red Listed species from Ramsar Sites}
Ramsar Target 6

There is a significant increase in area, numbers and ecological connectivity in the Ramsar Site network, in particular under-represented types of wetlands including in under-represented ecoregions and Transboundary Sites.

Baseline
  • By COP12, 2,186 Ramsar Sites have been designated. (Ramsar Sites database).
  • By COP12 2,085,000 ha of Ramsar Sites have been designated. (Ramsar Sites database).
  • By COP12 [16] transboundary Ramsar Sites have been designated. (Ramsar Secretariat).
  • By COP12, Ramsar Sites have been designated for the following under-represented Ramsar Sites:
    • Karst and other subterranean hydrological systems – [110 Sites]
    • Coral reefs – [96 Sites]
    • Wet grasslands – [517 Sites]
    • Peatlands – [564 Sites]
    • Sea-grass beds – [249 Sites]
    • Mangroves – [280 Sites]
    • Temporary Pools – [729 Sites]
    • Bivalve (shellfish) reefs – [99 Sites]
    • (Ramsar Sites database, June 2015).
Indicator
  • Number of Ramsar sites that have been designated. (Data source: Ramsar Sites database).
  • Total hectares of Ramsar sites that have been designated. (Data source: Ramsar Sites database).
  • Number of transboundary Ramsar Sites that have been designated. (Data source: Ramsar Sites database).
  • Number of Ramsar Sites designated for the following underrepresented wetland types:
    • Karst and other subterranean hydrological systems – [XXX Sites]
    • Coral reefs – [XXX Sites]
    • Wet grasslands – [XXX Sites]
    • Peatlands – [XXX Sites]
    • Sea-grass beds – [XXX Sites]
    • Mangroves – [XXX Sites] T
    • emporary Pools – [XXX Sites]
    • Bivalve (shellfish) reefs – [XXX Sites]
    • (Data source: Ramsar Sites database).
Ramsar Target 7

Sites that are at risk of change of ecological character have threats addressed.

Baseline
  • At COP12, [47] Ramsar Sites (2.2%) are listed on the Montreux Record. (Report of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 8.2 COP12 Doc.7).
  • 21% of Parties have reported to the Ramsar Secretariat all cases of negative human- induced change or likely change in the ecological character of Ramsar sites pursuant to Article 3.2. (National Reports to COP12).
  • [76] Ramsar Sites reported by Parties to the Ramsar Secretariat of negative human-induced change or likely change in the ecological character of Ramsar Sites pursuant to Article 3.2. (Data source: Report of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 8.2 COP12 Doc.7).
  • 16% of Parties have taken actions to address the issues for which Ramsar sites have been listed on the Montreux Record. (National Reports to COP12).
Indicator
  • Number of Ramsar Sites removed from the Montreux Record. (Data source: Ramsar Site database).
  • % of Parties reporting to the Ramsar Secretariat all cases of negative human-induced change or likely change in the ecological character of Ramsar Sites pursuant to Article 3.2. (Data source: National Reports).
  • Number of Ramsar Sites reported by Parties to the Ramsar Secretariat of negative human-induced change or likely change in the ecological character of Ramsar Sites pursuant to Article 3.2. (Data source: National Reports).
  • % of Parties that have taken actions to address the issues for which Ramsar Sites have been listed on the Montreux Record. (National Reports to COP12).

Possible further indicators that may be developed

  • {Indicator(s) relating to (numbers of) Ramsar Sites at risk}
Ramsar Target 8

National wetland inventories have been initiated, completed or updated and disseminated and used for promoting the conservation and effective management of all wetlands.

Baseline
  • At COP12, 47% of Parties have a complete national wetlands inventory. (National Reports to COP12).
  • At COP13, [XX]% of Parties % of Parties have updated their national inventories in the last decade. (New question for National Reports).
Indicator
  • % of Parties that have complete national wetland inventories. (Data source: National Reports).
  • % of Parties that have updated their national inventories in the last decade. (Data source: new question for National Reports).