К 2020 году традиционные знания, нововведения и практика коренных народов и местных общин, имеющие значение для сохранения и устойчивого использования биоразнообразия, и традиционное использование ими биологических ресурсов уважаются в соответствии с национальным законодательством и соответствующими международными обязательствами и полностью включены в процесс осуществления Конвенции и отражены в нем при всемерном и эффективном участии коренных народов и местных общин на всех соответствующих уровнях.

К 2020 году усовершенствованы, широко совместно используются, передаются и применяются знания, научная база и технологии, связанные с биоразнообразием, его стоимостной ценностью и функционированием, его статусом и тенденциями в этой области, а также с последствиями его утраты.

Indicators

• Indicator 52: Number of crop wild relatives conserved in situ and documented in a publicly available information system
• Indicator 53: Number of farmers’ varieties/landraces cultivated on-farm and documented in a publicly available information system
• Indicator 54: Number of accessions from ex situ collections documented in a publicly available information system
• Indicator 55: Number of released varieties documented in a publicly available information system
• Indicator 56: Participation in publicly accessible, international/regional PGRFA information systems

To generate global environmental benefits through effective implementation of the UNCCD

Indicators

UNCCD indicators:

• SO 4-1 Trends in carbon stocks above and below ground
• SO 4-2 Trends in abundance and distribution of selected species
• SO 4-3 Trends in protected area coverage of important biodiversity areas (Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas covered by protected areas) 

SDG indicators:

• 15.5.1 Red List Index
• 15.1.2 Proportion of important sites for terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity that are covered by protected areas, by ecosystem type (ER_PTD_TERR: Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas)

CBD indicators:

• A.3 Red List Index
• 3.1 Coverage of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures
• Protected area coverage of Key Biodiversity Areas (Component indicator under target 3)
• Proportion of terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecological regions that are conserved by protected areas or other effective area-based conservation measures (Complementary indicator under target 3 and 5)

Увеличить объем научных знаний, расширить научные исследования и обеспечить передачу морских технологий, принимая во внимание Критерии и руководящие принципы в отношении передачи морских технологий, разработанные Межправительственной океанографической комиссией, с тем чтобы улучшить экологическое состояние океанской среды и повысить вклад морского биоразнообразия в развитие развивающихся стран, особенно малых островных развивающихся государств и наименее развитых стран

Explanation: Parties play a key role in providing information at a national scale, but this can also be supported by the CMS Secretariat, through facilitation of the State of the World’s Migratory Species report and other knowledge products, if resources are available. The availability of this information is critical for decision-making and implementation of the CMS, its Resolutions and Decisions and associated guidance. Parties are able to understand and analyse the best available science and information on species, habitats and ranges in a way that enables them to prioritize and collaboratively take effective conservation action. 

Explanation: Parties commit to completing National Reports each triennium, and actively contribute to improving the National Reporting process to ensure the best available information on the state of implementation of the CMS mandate. This information is compiled and used for prioritization and adaptation of CMS initiatives for migratory species conservation. 

Explanation: Parties commit to use the best available science for decision-making and share information to ensure adequate implementation of the CMS mandate. Through the COP and its subsidiary bodies, Parties collaboratively ensure there is adequate monitoring of the implementation of the CMS mandate and agree to modify, improve or cancel existing initiatives based on best available science, with the aim of increasing their efficiency and impact, taking into account the knowledge of Indigenous People and Local Communities.

Explanation: Parties undertake actions, with the support of the CMS Secretariat, that increase the international recognition of the importance of migratory species, their habitats and the ecosystem services they provide. 

Explanation: Parties undertake actions, with the support of the CMS Secretariat, that increase the international recognition of the role of CMS, and its contribution to the strategic goals of other multilateral environmental agreements, IGOs, NGOs and CMS stakeholders. 

National wetland inventories have been initiated, completed or updated and disseminated and used for promoting the conservation and effective management of all wetlands.

Baseline

• At COP12, 47% of Parties have a complete national wetlands inventory. (National Reports to COP12).
• At COP13, [XX]% of Parties % of Parties have updated their national inventories in the last decade. (New question for National Reports).

Indicator

• % of Parties that have complete national wetland inventories. (Data source: National Reports).
• % of Parties that have updated their national inventories in the last decade. (Data source: new question for National Reports).

Scientific guidance and technical methodologies at global and regional levels are developed on relevant topics and are available to policy makers and practitioners in an appropriate format and language.

Baseline

• In 2015, [543] ‘hits’ on scientific and technical guidance pages of the Ramsar web-site. (Data source: Google Analytics Ramsar web-site, May-June, 2015).
• In 2015, [60] ‘hits’ on STRP briefing notes from the Ramsar web-site. (Data source: Google Analytics Ramsar web-site, May-June, 2015)).
• In 2015, [176] ‘hits’ of relevant Ramsar Handbooks downloaded from the Ramsar web-site (Data source: Google Analytics Ramsar web-site, May-June, 2015).
• In 2015, [150} practical tools and guidance documents for wetland conservation and wise use, and other key scientific documentation, which has been developed by either STRP, Parties and others, and is available via the Ramsar website. (Data source: Ramsar web-site).

Indicator

• Number of ‘hits’ on scientific and technical guidance pages of the Ramsar web-site and associated subtotals by country and Ramsar Region of the source of these hits. (Data source: Ramsar web-site analytics).
• Number of STRP briefing papers downloaded from the Ramsar website and subtotals by country and Ramsar Region of the source of these downloads. (Data source: Ramsar web-site analytics).
• Number of relevant Ramsar Handbooks downloaded from the Ramsar web-site and subtotals by country and Ramsar Region of the source of these downloads. (Data source: Ramsar web-site analytics).
• Number of practical tools and guidance documents for wetland conservation and wise use, and other key scientific documentation, which has been developed by either STRP, Parties and others, and is available via the Ramsar website. (Data source: Ramsar web-site).

Possible further indicators that may be developed

• {Indicator(s) related to the use of guidance and availability in various language versions}.

Wetlands conservation and wise use are mainstreamed through communication, capacity development, education, participation and awareness.

Baseline

World Wetland Day

• 89% of Parties have branded Word Wetlands Day activities. (National Reports to COP12).
• In 2015 884 World Wetland Day activities or events reported to the Secretariat. (Data source: Ramsar Secretariat CEPA program)
• In 2015, [379} internet references (in the press) to World Wetland Day activities. (Data source: Meltwater internet analysis).
• In 2015, [58, 566} individual visits to the World Wetlands Day website. {Data source: worldwetlandsday.org website }.
• In 2015 Social media links to World Wetland Day: 16,135,974 people reached in FaceBook . (Data source: https://www.facebook.com/RamsarConventionOnWetlands) .
• 795 views of WWD message from Youtube channel (Data source Ramsar Youtube Channel https://www.youtube.com/user/RamsarConvention)
• 292,100 reached in Twitter (Data source https://twitter.com/RamsarConv)

CEPA programmes

• 80% of Parties with a) a governmental CEPA National Focal Point and 69% of Parties with b) a non-governmental National Focal Point. (Data source: Ramsar Secretariat Data Base and National Reports to COP12).
• 27% of Parties have established national action plans for wetland CEPA. (National Reports to COP12).

Visitor centres

• By COP12, 636 centres (visitor centres, interpretation centres, education centres) have been established in Ramsar sites. (National Reports to COP12).
• By COP12, 309 centres established at other wetlands. (National Reports to COP12).

Indicator

World Wetland Day

• % of Parties that have branded World Wetlands Day activities. (Data source: National Reports).
• Number of World Wetland Day activities or events reported to the Secretariat. (Data source: Ramsar CEPA program).
• Number of internet references to World Wetland Day activities. {Data source: internet analysis}.
• Number of internet references to the Ramsar Convention. {Data source: internet analysis}.
• Number of social media links to World Wetland Day. {Data source: social media analysis}.

CEPA programmes

• % of Parties with a) a governmental CEPA National Focal Point and b) a non-governmental National Focal Point (Data source: National Reports).
• % of Parties that have established national action plans for wetland CEPA. (Data source: National Reports).

Visitor centres

• Number of centres (visitor centres, interpretation centres, education centres) have been established in Ramsar Sites. (Data source: National Reports).
• Number of centres at other wetlands. (Data source: National Reports).

Possible further indicators that may be developed

• {Indicator(s) related to whether and how wetland conservation and wise-use issues are included formal education programmes}

Objective 2.3 Parties have sufficient information to enforce the Convention.

Indicator

• Indicator 2.3.1: Proportion of Parties that are making use of the available tools. For instance, one could look at Google Analytics for the number of site visits to the CITES website, CITES Checklist, or Species+ or the number of downloads from the CITES Trade Database as a proxy for usage of shared tools.
• Indicator 2.3.2: Percentage of Parties reporting having sufficient information to enforce the Convention.

Objective 2.4 Parties have sufficient information to make listing decisions that are reflective of species conservation needs.

Indicator

• Indicator 2.4.1: Percentage of Parties reporting having sufficient information to make listing decisions that are reflective of species conservation needs.

Objective 2.5 Information gaps and needs for key species are identified and addressed.

Indicator

• Indicator 2.5.1: Number of Parties that have undertaken research (including for non-detriment findings) on their identified key species most relevant to the implementation of the Convention.
• Indicator 2.5.2: Number of Parties that currently lack information for their identified key species most relevant to the implementation of the Convention and need assistance to address them.

Objective 4.3 Awareness of the role, purpose and achievements of CITES is increased globally.

Indicator

• Indicator 4.3.1: Number of new, unique visits to the CITES website.
• Indicator 4.3.2: Number of Parties with information on CITES and its requirements on their official websites.
• Indicator 4.3.3: Number of followers on CITES social media platforms.
• Indicator 4.3.4: Number of key identified hashtags (e.g. #cites, #citescop19 #worldwildlifeday, etc.) on CITES social media.
• Indicator 4.3.5: Number of events submitted to the World Wildlife Day website.

Objective 4.4 CITES Parties are informed of international actions for sustainable development that may have a bearing on achieving the goal of CITES.

Indicator

• Indicator 4.4.1: Number of meetings/CoP where representatives of other international bodies report on relevant activities to CITES Parties.
• Indicator 4.4.2: Events, documents and presentations, etc. delivered by other intergovernmental bodies and fora in meetings convened by the CITES Secretariat.
• Indicator 4.4.3: Number of Notifications to the Parties issued by the CITES Secretariat relating to international actions for sustainable development that may have a bearing on achieving the goal of CITES.