到2020年，所有鱼群和无脊椎动物种群及水生植物都以可持续和合法的方式进行管理和捕捞，并采用基于生态系统的方式，以避免过度捕捞，同时对所有枯竭物种制定恢复计划和措施，使渔业对受威胁鱼群和脆弱生态系统不产生有害影响，将渔业对种群、物种和生态系统的影响控制在安全的生态阈值范围内。

到2020年，农业、水产养殖业及林业用地实现可持续管理，确保生物多样性得到保护。

Indicators

• Indicator 7: Number of households that received seeds for planting as an aid after disaster situations
• Indicator 8: Percentage of seed produced at the local level out of that made available through disaster response interventions
• Indicator 9: Existence of disaster risk management policies for restoring crop systems that include seed security provisions

Indicators

• Indicator 30: Number of crops with active public pre-breeding and breeding programmes
• Indicator 31: Number of crops with active private pre-breeding and breeding programmes
• Indicator 32: Number of breeding activities oriented to small scale farmers, villages or traditional communities
• Indicator 33: Number of active public crop breeders
• Indicator 34: Number of active private crop breeders

Indicators

• Indicator 35: Number of programmes/projects/activities to increase inter-specific diversity within crop production systems
• Indicator 36: Number of new crop and wild species introduced into cultivation

Indicators

• Indicator 37: Existence of national policies that promote development and commercialization of farmers’ varieties/landraces and underutilized species
• Indicator 38: Number of programmes/projects/activities promoting development and commercialization of farmers’ varieties/landraces and underutilized species
• Indicator 39: Number of farmers’ varieties/landraces and underutilized species with potential for commercialization identified

Indicators

• Indicator 40: Number of new varieties released
• Indicator 41: Number of formal/registered seed enterprises
• Indicator 42: The least number of varieties that together account for 80% of the total area for each of the five most widely cultivated crops
• Indicator 43: Percentage of area supplied with seed meeting the quality standard of the formal seed sector for the five most widely cultivated annual crops
• Indicator 44: Existence of a national seed policy and/or seed law

To improve the condition of affected ecosystems, combat desertification/land degradation, promote sustainable land management and contribute to land degradation neutrality

Indicators

UNCCD indicators:

• SO 1-1 Trends in land cover
• SO 1-2 Trends in land productivity or functioning of the land
• SO 1-3 Trends in carbon stocks above and below ground
• SO 1-4 Proportion of land that is degraded over total land area

SDG indicators:

• 15.3.1 Proportion of land that is degraded over total land area

CBD indicators:

• A.2 Extent of natural ecosystems
• 2.2 Area under restoration 
• Extent of natural ecosystems by type (Component indicator under target 2)
• Proportion of total land area that is under cultivation (Complementary indicator under target 1)
• Above-ground biomass stock in forests (tonnes/ha)  (Complementary indicator under target 8)
• Changes in soil organic carbon stocks (Complementary indicator under target 10)
• Proportion of land that is degraded over total land area (Complementary indicator under target 10)

到2030年，实现农业生产力翻倍和小规模粮食生产者，特别是妇女、土著居民、农户、牧民和渔民的收入翻番，具体做法包括确保平等获得土地、其他生产资源和要素、知识、金融服务、市场以及增值和非农就业机会

到2030年，确保建立可持续粮食生产体系并执行具有抗灾能力的农作方法，以提高生产力和产量，帮助维护生态系统，加强适应气候变化、极端天气、干旱、洪涝和其他灾害的能力，逐步改善土地和土壤质量

各国在照顾发展中国家发展水平和能力的基础上，落实《可持续消费和生产模式十年方案框架》，发达国家在此方面要做出表率

到2030年，实现自然资源的可持续管理和高效利用

到2030年，增加小岛屿发展中国家和最不发达国家通过可持续利用海洋资源获得的经济收益，包括可持续地管理渔业、水产养殖业和旅游业

到2020年，推动对所有类型森林进行可持续管理，停止毁林，恢复退化的森林，大幅增加全球植树造林和重新造林

Explanation: Steps will be taken towards eliminating and/or reducing the negative impacts on migratory species from the loss and degradation of important habitats and ranges because of land-use change and fragmentation. This includes tackling known threats such as unsustainable intensive agriculture, damaging afforestation, urbanization or human-made infrastructure. 

Water use respects wetland ecosystem needs for them to fulfil their functions and provide services at the appropriate scale inter alia at the basin level or along a coastal zone.

Baseline

70% of Parties have included wetland issues into national strategies and planning processes such as water resource management and water efficiency plans. (National Reports to COP12).

Indicator

• % of Parties that have included wetland issues into national strategies and in the planning processes such as for water resource management and water efficiency plans. (Data source: National Reports).

Possible further indicators that may be developed:

• {% of Ramsar sites which have improved the sustainability of water use in the context of ecosystem requirements}

The public and private sectors have increased their efforts to apply guidelines and good practices for the wise use of water and wetlands.

Baseline

• 50% of Parties report actions taken to implement incentive measures that encourage the conservation and wise use of wetlands. (National Reports to COP12).
• 37% of Parties report actions taken to remove perverse incentive measures that discourage conservation and wise use of wetlands. (National Reports to COP12).
• 60% of Parties report private sector undertaking activities for the conservation, wise use and management of wetlands in general. (National Reports to COP12).
• % of Parties have national Ramsar Committees that include both governmental and non-governmental representation. (Data source: new question for National Reports).

Indicator

• % of Parties reporting actions taken to implement incentive measures that encourage the conservation and wise use of wetlands. (Data source: National Reports).
• % of Parties reporting actions taken to remove perverse incentive measures that discourage conservation and wise use of wetlands. (Data source: National Reports).
• % of Parties reporting private sector undertaking activities for the conservation, wise use and management of wetlands in general. (Data source: National Reports).
• % of Parties having national Ramsar Committees that include both governmental and non-governmental representation. (Data source: new question for National Reports).

Sites that are at risk of change of ecological character have threats addressed.

Baseline

• At COP12, [47] Ramsar Sites (2.2%) are listed on the Montreux Record. (Report of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 8.2 COP12 Doc.7).
• 21% of Parties have reported to the Ramsar Secretariat all cases of negative human- induced change or likely change in the ecological character of Ramsar sites pursuant to Article 3.2. (National Reports to COP12).
• [76] Ramsar Sites reported by Parties to the Ramsar Secretariat of negative human-induced change or likely change in the ecological character of Ramsar Sites pursuant to Article 3.2. (Data source: Report of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 8.2 COP12 Doc.7).
• 16% of Parties have taken actions to address the issues for which Ramsar sites have been listed on the Montreux Record. (National Reports to COP12).

Indicator

• Number of Ramsar Sites removed from the Montreux Record. (Data source: Ramsar Site database).
• % of Parties reporting to the Ramsar Secretariat all cases of negative human-induced change or likely change in the ecological character of Ramsar Sites pursuant to Article 3.2. (Data source: National Reports).
• Number of Ramsar Sites reported by Parties to the Ramsar Secretariat of negative human-induced change or likely change in the ecological character of Ramsar Sites pursuant to Article 3.2. (Data source: National Reports).
• % of Parties that have taken actions to address the issues for which Ramsar Sites have been listed on the Montreux Record. (National Reports to COP12).

Possible further indicators that may be developed

• {Indicator(s) relating to (numbers of) Ramsar Sites at risk}

The wise use of wetlands is strengthened through integrated resource management at the appropriate scale, inter alia, within a river basin or along a coastal zone.

Baseline

• 55% of Parties have adopted wetland policies or equivalent instruments that promote the wise use of their wetlands. (National Reports to COP12).
• 71% of Parties consider wetlands as natural water infrastructure integral to water resource management at the scale of river basin. (National Reports to COP12).

Indicator

• % of Parties that have adopted wetland policies or equivalent instruments that promote the wise use of their wetlands. (Data source: National Reports).
• % of Parties that consider wetlands as natural water infrastructure integral to water resource management at the scale of river basin. (Data source: National Reports).

Possible further indicators that may be developed

• {Involvement of stakeholders in various aspects of wetland and/or basin-scale management}

Enhanced sustainability of key sectors such as water, energy, mining, agriculture, tourism, urban development, infrastructure, industry, forestry, aquaculture and fisheries, when they affect wetlands, contributing to biodiversity conservation and human livelihoods.

Baseline

-

Indicator

Possible further indicators that may be developed

• {Indicators related to the relevant sectors especially using or linking to relevant Aichi Target indicators and other relevant international processes}.

 Objective 1.1 Parties comply with their obligations under the Convention through the adoption and implementation of appropriate legislation, policies, and procedures.

Indicator

• Indicator 1.1.1: Number of Parties that are in category 1 under the national legislation project.
• Indicator 1.1.2: Number of Parties subject to CITES recommendations to suspend trade.

Objective 1.3 Implementation of the Convention at the national level is consistent with Resolutions and Decisions adopted by the Conference of the Parties.

Indicator

• Indicator 1.3.1: Number of Parties that have implemented relevant reporting under Resolutions and Decisions of the Conference of the Parties and/or Standing Committee recommendations.

Objective 1.5 Parties improve the conservation status of CITES-listed specimens, put in place national conservation actions, support their sustainable use and promote cooperation in managing shared wildlife resources.

Indicator

• Indicator 1.5.1: The conservation status of species listed on the CITES Appendices has stabilized or improved.
• Indicator 1.5.2: Number of CITES-listed species for which Parties have put in place actions that support sustainable use

Rational

This aims to reduce the international spread of pests, as the losses caused by the spread of a new pest into new areas or crops can be much more catastrophic than endemic pests in a given area. The impact of plant pests on food security is particularly evident in the developing world, where plant health regulatory frameworks often lack capacity. If the spread of pests is reduced and pest management is improved, crop productivity can increase and production costs can be reduced.

2030 key result area A1:

All NPPOs have effective pest surveillance systems in place for timely detection of new pest arrivals and monitoring spread.

All NPPOs have strong capacities to monitor, detect, diagnose, report, and prepare rapid responses to pest outbreaks, so that these pests do not have major impacts on food supplies and they do not spread and thereby threaten other regions and trading partners.

A3: A plant health emergency response system is in place that facilitates timely action against new pest incursions and supports countries with emergency response systems tools and knowledge.

A4: Sustainable pest risk management options, such as systems approaches, are implemented widely to minimize pest impacts right through the production process and harvesting, and to minimize the need for end-point treatments.

A5: All NPPOs have pest risk analysis capacity in place to identify and mitigate pest risks to crop production.

A6: Pest risk prevention is integrated throughout the production, processing and trade chain of plants and plant products.